Search Results for "Vicarious liability"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Issued as Security — Endorsement on Cheque and Plaint Admission Confirm Security Purpose, No Legally Enforceable Debt Exists

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Directors and Managing Director of R.L. Steels & Energy Limited, quashing the criminal complaint un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partner's Challenge to Prosecution Under Section 138 NI Act Without Joining Firm. Partnership Firm Not a Separate Legal Entity; Partner Can Be Prosecuted Individually for Cheque Dishonour.

The case involves four criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioner, Philip J., challenging the order dated 23 July 2013 passed by the Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Section 141 NI Act requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business at the time of offence.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Resignation Prior to Cheque Issuance and Absence of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act Lead to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by Bhagirath Chandulal Arya (respondent No. 1) under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Applicant Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company, No Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1, Ashwin Ramesh Mittal, under Section 138 ...