Search Results for "Upsarpanch"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Upsarpanch"

33 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Village Panchayat Members Challenging Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Mere Registration of Forest Offence Without Conviction Does Not Attract Disqualification.

28 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Raju s/o Mansaram Pawar and his wife Yashoda w/o Raju Pawar, were elected members of the Village Panchayat, Jamdighat, in 2017. Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Woman Panchayat Member for Lack of Toilet — Holds That Possession of Toilet Constructed by Husband Satisfies Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act. The court ruled that the disqualification provision must be strictly construed and that the petitioner's use of a toilet constructed by her husband met the legal requirement.

25 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Rukhminibai Badrinath Shedage, was a member and Up-Sarpanch of Village Gram Panchayat, Dhakalgaon, District Jalna. She was elected on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Tender Misconduct Case — Enquiry Vitiated by Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act set aside for lack of fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and consider defence.

21 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Sau. Leena Ramesh Dongarwar, was the Sarpanch of Navegaon Bandh Gram Panchayat. She was removed from office by an order of the Deputy ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch — Procedural Irregularities Not Sufficient to Invalidate Motion Passed by Majority. The court held that the no-confidence motion passed by a majority of 9 out of 13 members was valid under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not vitiate the motion.

22 Nov 2016

The petitioners, 13 ex-members of the Grampanchayat of Rukadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Due to Invalid Service of Notice. Service of notice on a relative who is not a family member and not authorized to accept is not valid under Section 35(3B) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

3 Dec 2015

The petitioners, members of Gram Panchayat Bhoyni, challenged the order dated 04/09/2015 passed by the Additional Collector, Washim, which allowed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat Under Section 145(1A) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act, 1958 — Resignations of Members Not Voluntary Due to Coercion. The court held that the Divisional Commissioner failed to verify voluntariness of resignations before dissolving the Gram Panchayat, and the dissolution order was set aside.

9 Jul 2015

The petitioners, Sau. Jyoti Purushhottam Tembhurne (Sarpanch) and Shri Dinesh Hanuman Tembhurne (member), challenged the order dated 22-4-2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch and Upsarpanch in No-Confidence Motion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 17. Failure to Move Motion as Mandated Renders Subsequent Notice Invalid Under Section 35(3A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

26 Feb 2014

The petitioners, Ravindra Sukhdeo Sanap (Sarpanch) and Vishnu Eknath Nagare (Upsarpanch) of Gram Panchayat Andhera, challenged a notice dated 07.12.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Election of Sarpanch and UpSarpanch by Draw of Lots. Inclusion of Blank Chits in Draw Does Not Invalidate Election Under Section 33(4) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1960 and Rule 16 of Election Rules, 1964.

14 Mar 2011

The case involves an appeal against a Single Judge's order that upheld the election of respondents as Sarpanch and UpSarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadhon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Grampanchayat Election Dispute — Caste Certificate Cancellation Upheld as Valid Ground for Disqualification. The court held that the cancellation of a caste certificate by the Scrutiny Committee is a valid ground for disqualification under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the election of a candidate whose caste claim is invalidated is void.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising from a writ petition concerning the election of the ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)