Search Results for "Upa Sarpanch"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Removal of Up-Sarpanch and Panchayat Member for Illegal Attempt to Transfer Sarpanch's Statutory Powers | Section 39 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of Hiware Village Panchayat, sought removal of Respondent Nos. 5 (Up-Sarpanch) and 6 (Member) under Section 39(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Divisional Commissioner's Order on Sarpanch Resignation Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Procedural Non-Compliance Leads to Upholding of Resignation Dispute

The petitioners, filed a writ petition against the Divisional Commissioner's order allowing an appeal by Respondent No. 1, Sarpanch, regarding the gen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Resolution and Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute. Court upholds validity of resolution and order, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The petitioners, twelve residents of Sangav, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Failure to Convene Monthly Meetings — Responsibility Lies with Village Development Officer Under Meeting Rules, Not Sarpanch Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

The petitioner, Salimbi Mubarak Tamboli, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Savargaon (Dere) in 2015, unopposed as the only OBC candidate. The U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Dismissing No Confidence Motion Dispute for Lack of Hearing. Petitioner's Application Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Dismissed Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sunil Bhaskar Katkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Belati Grampanchayat in June 2015. On 3rd March 2018, respondent nos.1 to 6 filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...