Search Results for "Tribunal award restored"

542 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. The court restored the arbitral award holding that the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by reappreciating evidence.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 16 January 2009 under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Reinstating District Judge's Decision Upholding Arbitral Award. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Re-evaluating Evidence and Decreeing Claim, Contrary to Limited Scope of Judicial Review.

The dispute originated from a contract dated 4 April 2002 between Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd and M/s Ramesh Kumar and Company for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...