Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets
13 Jun 2024The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....
Search Results for "Trade Union Recognition"
332 result(s) found
Found 332 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in ISRO Drivers Association Recognition Case — Association Formed on Job Description Not a 'Distinct Category' Under Rule 5(c) of CCS (Recognition of Service Associations) Rules, 1993. The Court held that the expression 'distinct category' must be determined by the concerned Ministry/Department based on functional, administrative and organizational set up, and not merely on job description.
10 Aug 2020The Government of India and others appealed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which had directed the appe...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Union's Locus Standi in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Transfer Orders Quashed as Union Need Not Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to File Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
25 Jun 2018The case involves a challenge by M/s Prabhat Dairy Ltd and others (the employer) against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane, which allowed a co...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority Order Under Contract Labour Act — Union Lacks Locus Standi as Individual Workers Not Parties. Petitioner Union failed to establish that it was a recognized union or that the individual workers were parties to the appeal, and the Appellate Authority's order was not shown to be perverse or illegal.
9 Aug 2016The petitioners, comprising two individual workers (Ambadas Dattatraya Rahinj and Balasaheb Ashok Londhe) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Kamgar Sanghat...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Pilots' Union to Operate, Quashes Suspension of Registration by Industrial Tribunal. The Court held that the Industrial Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 by suspending registration and restraining the union from raising industrial disputes, as such powers are not conferred by the Act.
27 Nov 2013The Petitioner, National Aviators Guild, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, comprising about 117 pilots of Jet Airways (India)...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.
28 Nov 2011The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.
22 Nov 2006The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order for Non-Speaking Nature and Non-Compliance with Form-C in Trade Union Recognition Dispute. The Court held that a quasi-judicial authority must provide reasons for its decision and that strict compliance with procedural requirements under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 is mandatory.
11 Oct 2006The petitioner, Shramik Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order dated 23-8-2006 passed by the Industrial ...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Allowing Union to Lead Evidence in Recognition Dispute. The Court held that the Industrial Court has discretion to permit additional evidence at any stage to effectuate the purpose of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
17 Apr 2006The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a recognized trade union of employees of Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Pune,...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of Another Union.
2 Feb 2005The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner Union, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, which was a recognized trade union in the undertaking of Respondent No.2...
- 95
