Search Results for "Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal on Counting Part-Time Service for Pension Under Rule 11 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. The Court Relied on a Common Judgment Holding that Rule 11’s Welfare Provision for Temporary Service Cannot Be Extended to Part-Time Panchayat Clerks.

Background: The present intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent was filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Principal Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Appeal Against Order Granting 50% Pension Computation for Part-Time Panchayat Clerks. Dispute Centers on Applicability of G.O.Ms.No.39 and Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 to Part-Time Service.

The present intra-court appeal was filed by the State of Tamil Nadu under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order of a Single Judge in W.P.No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Counting of Part-Time Service for Pension Under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. State Appeals Against Writ Court Order Extending 50% Benefit to Part-Time Panchayat Clerks.

The intra-court appeal was instituted under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging a common order of the Writ Court th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State's Appeal, Reverses Counting of 50% Part-Time Service as Full Regular Service for Pension. Rule 11 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 Only Provides for Counting 50% of Temporary Service and Cannot be Expanded Beyond Its Stipulations.

The State of Tamil Nadu preferred an intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of a single Judge in WP No. 6480 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State Appeal in Pension Cut Case — Upholds Departmental Punishment for Proved Charges. Writ Court's interference set aside as disciplinary proceedings were conducted in compliance with Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 and principles of natural justice.

The case involves a Writ Appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against an order dated 24.03.2022 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.34053/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses TANGEDCO Appeal in Dismissed Employee Leave Encashment Case. Leave Encashment is Not a Pensionary Benefit Under Rule 21 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of TANGEDCO against a single judge order dated 26.08.2022 in W.P. No. 4503...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CMA NO.2543 OF 2018

The dispute arose over the legal heirship and terminal benefits of deceased Sundaramoorthy, who worked as a clerk in the Corporation of Chennai and di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...