Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

1123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Auction Sale Consideration Prevails Over Market Value. Stamp duty on sale certificate must be computed on actual auction sale consideration, not market value, under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Shweta Aditya Malhotra, purchased a property through an auction sale conducted by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri Division, Mumbai, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Levy of Stamp Duty on Mining Lease Deeds — Stamp Duty on Mining Lease Deeds Must Be Computed Under Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Based on Average Annual Royalty, Not on Dead Rent or Total Consideration.

The petitioners, who are holders of mining leases for minor minerals in the State of Maharashtra, challenged the levy of stamp duty on their mining le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment on Writ Petition Against Refusal of Stamp Duty Refund Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Limitation Dispute Under Section 48(3) Due to Correction of Applicant's Name Beyond Six Months.

The writ petition was filed by Freedom City Ventures, a partnership firm, seeking to quash the order dated 21st June 2014 passed by the Inspector Gene...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deficit Stamp Duty Demand — Limitation Period Under Section 32-A(1) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Is Mandatory. Demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty made after 5 years from execution of instrument is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

The petitioner, Meena Shyam Tulsani, purchased a commercial office premises admeasuring 351 sq.ft super built up area in 1999 through a notarized agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 50C of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Stamp Duty Dispute. Development Agreement Stamp Duty Based on Ready Reckoner Rate Upheld; Section 50C Not Ultra Vires.

The petitioner, Bhatia Nagar Premises Cooperative Society Limited, is a cooperative society that owns land with a building. It entered into a Developm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impounding of Unregistered MoU Under Stamp Act in Civil Suit — Trial Court's Rejection Set Aside. Section 33 of Maharashtra Stamp Act Mandates Impounding of Insufficiently Stamped Documents Irrespective of Registration Requirement Under Section 49 of Registration Act.

The petitioners, Yuvraj Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...