Search Results for "Sharif Ahmed case"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Sharif Ahmed case"

41 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Criminal Revision Seeking Direction for Registration of FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in Alleged Government Land Encroachment Matter. The Court Ruled That a Social Activist Without Personal Right Lacks Locus Standi and That Mere Allegation of Encroachment Without Disclosing Essential Ingredients of a Cognizable Offence Does Not Justify Invocation of Criminal Process.

7 Jul 2026

The litigation arose from a criminal revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order of the Ju...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Sale Dispute Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Civil Nature of Allegations. The Court held that mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating under Section 415 IPC, and criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 406, 354, 504, and 506 IPC were an abuse of process as the dispute involved non-payment of sale consideration and sale of property at a lower price, which are civil matters.

16 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute arising from an oral agreement for the sale of a property in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, between the appellants (sell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Limitation Under Section 36(8) of Waqf Act, 1995 is Directory — Waqf Board Can Entertain Registration Applications Beyond Three Months. The court overruled the earlier view in Mohd. Ansar Salik v. Shaikh Hamid Babumiya Inamdar that the limitation was mandatory, allowing the petitioners' application to be considered on merits.

18 Dec 2019

This judgment by a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur addresses a reference arising from a writ petition where a learned Single Judge dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Society Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Principles of Natural Justice or Jurisdictional Error. The court held that the Joint Charity Commissioner had jurisdiction to decide the application under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 and that the petitioners were given adequate opportunity of hearing.

25 Mar 2019

The petitioners, twenty individuals claiming to be members of the Talha Education and Welfare Society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. The court found the eyewitnesses credible and their testimony consistent, corroborated by medical evidence, leading to dismissal of the appeal.

12 Feb 2016

The appellant, Mohd Sharif Mehboob Badshakhan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.230 of 1999 for the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Drastic Alternatives — Detenues Already in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Preventive detention order invalid as detaining authority did not consider possibility of bail or less drastic measures despite detenues being in judicial custody.

7 Jul 2006

The Bombay High Court disposed of two criminal writ petitions challenging detention orders dated 30th June 2005 passed under Section 3(1) of the Mahar...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)