Search Results for "Section 95A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 95A"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Society's Right to Develop Land in Siddharth Nagar, Rejects MHADA's Claim of Ownership. The court held that the cooperative society representing occupants of Patra chawls is entitled to development rights over 10 acres of land as per government resolution, and MHADA cannot unilaterally terminate the development agreement.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves a dispute over the development of land in Siddharth Nagar, Goregaon, Mumbai. The Bombay Housing and Area Development Board (now MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion Seeking Interim Relief to Enforce Foreign Judgment — Foreign Judgment Not Deemed Decree Until Suit Decided; No Prima Facie Case for Interim Attachment of Properties.

14 Jun 2011

The plaintiffs, Dhirajlal alias Dhirubhai Babaria and Ashwin alias Ashwinbhai Babaria, both citizens of the United States, filed a suit in the Bombay ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Right to Reside in Matrimonial Home Under MHADA Scheme — Emphasizes Rehabilitation of Dishoused Occupiers. The Court held that the wife's right to residence is not absolute and must be balanced with the rights of co-owners and the terms of the redevelopment agreement under Section 95-A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

27 Apr 2020

The appellant, Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking enforcement of her right to reside in her matrimoni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

Supreme Court

Judicial Review of State Actions in Contractual Disputes: Evolution and Current Scope. From Traditional Boundaries to Modern Oversight: Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in State Contractual Matters

9 Jul 2024

The evolution of judicial review in India regarding state actions in contractual and tender disputes. Historically, such disputes were seen as private...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

2 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)