Search Results for "Section 8"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Rejection of Section 8 Application. Development Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause, Disputes Must Be Referred to Arbitration.

The Appellant, Om Swayambhu Siddhivinayak, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Stay of Civil Suit Pending Arbitration in Joint Venture Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Joint Venture Agreement Mandates Reference to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s Eagle AgroFarm Private Limited, owned certain properties and entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 9 May 2006 with Responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Maintainability of Section 11 Application Not Barred by Pending Section 8 Application in Suit.

The review petitioner, M/s. Raman Feedmills, sought recall of an order dated 24th August 2013 passed by the designate of the Chief Justice under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Civil Court Order Refusing Reference to Arbitration in Dealership Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Agreement Mandates Reference Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) and its dealer, M/s. Parshwa Auto Center. HPCL had issued a show-cause...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Suit to Arbitration Due to Inseparable Cause of Action and Non-Arbitrable Issues. Trial Court's order upheld as suit involved multiple defendants not party to arbitration agreement and issues not arbitrable.

The appellant, Bombay Isle Developers Pvt. Ltd., the original Defendant No.1, appealed against the order of the City Civil Judge dated 2nd March 2006 ...