Search Results for "Section 78(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 78(3)"

132 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute Over Succession Certificate — Held That Succession Certificate Is Not Necessary for Claiming Title by Adverse Possession or Will. The court clarified that a succession certificate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is not a prerequisite for filing a suit for declaration of title based on a Will or adverse possession, and that the Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide such matters.

14 Nov 2025

The case involves two cross civil revision applications arising from a property dispute between Maharukh Mediomah Patel (applicant in CRA/64/2021) and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

7 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition for Karwar Port Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession.

11 Apr 2019

The petitioners, fishermen residing in Goudawada, Baitkhol, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Impleadment Application in Partnership Suit — Assignment of Right to Sue Does Not Confer Right to Be Substituted as Party Without Leave of Court Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC.

22 Jun 2017

The present Chamber Summons was taken out by third party applicants, MahHill Properties Pvt. Ltd. and another, seeking impleadment as party defendants...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Cheque Dishonour Case — Applicants Granted Pre-Arrest Bail. No Prima Facie Case Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Made Out Against Applicants.

22 Mar 2013

The judgment pertains to two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicants in Crimina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Dividend in Liquidation Under Section 2(6A)(c) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Distribution on Liquidation Attributed to Accumulated Profits to be Determined on the Basis of Accumulated Profits Immediately Before Liquidation.

7 Oct 1966

The respondent company was placed under voluntary winding up by resolution dated August 23, 1952. Its paid-up capital was Rs. 25 lakhs and accumulated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Employees from Municipal Corporation to State Government. Transfer of employees under Section 451 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 held valid as in public interest and for better administration.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) challenging their transfer to the Sta...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)