Search Results for "Section 61(1)"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Minor Pedestrian. The court held that the insurer failed to prove breach of policy conditions or contributory negligence, affirming the Tribunal's award under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 30th December 2009 at about 7:10 a.m. on Dr. B.A. Road, Mumbai. The claimant, Mast. Siddanth Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was an interested witness with material contradictions.

The case pertains to the murder of one person, for which the appellants (original accused Nos. 3 and 4) along with three other co-accused were tried. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Transfer of Shares as Gift During Internal Restructuring Not Constituting Income Escape Assessment When Full Disclosure Made During Scrutiny.

The petitioner, Asian Satellite Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in trading, investment, and finance, filed its return of income...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case — 13-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Conscious possession of 2.5 kg heroin in checked-in baggage established; presumption under Section 35 NDPS Act not rebutted.

The appellant, Okacha Mike, a Nigerian national aged 68 years, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Reasons on Counterclaim and Limitation. Arbitrator Must Provide Sufficient Reasons When Rejecting Counterclaim on Limitation and Merits Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Arun T. Gujrathi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...