Search Results for "Section 489B IPC"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Appellants in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 489B r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or use of counterfeit currency notes.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Prabhakar Patlola and Venkatesh Chanda under Section 489B read with Section 34 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge and Intent. Conviction under Sections 489B and 489C IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the appellant knew or had reason to believe the notes were counterfeit.

The appellant, Smt. Jahanurbir Gayasuddin Shaikh, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Gr. Mumbai, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Conviction under Section 489C IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellants knew or had reason to believe the notes were counterfeit.

The appellants, Manirul Maulavi Mustafa and others, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for possession of counterfeit currency notes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 489B and 489C IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession and intent beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, T.N. Kumara, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in SC No.12/2012 for offences under Sections 489B and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea. Possession and Use of Single Counterfeit Note Without Proof of Knowledge or Fraudulent Intent Fails to Establish Offences Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Mohammed Shabbir, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 489B (using as genuine a forged o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Possession and Use of Fake Currency Notes Under IPC Sections 489B and 489C. The court affirmed the trial court's finding that the appellant knowingly used and possessed a counterfeit Rs.500 note, rejecting the appeal for lack of merit.

The appellant, Mansur Azaruddin Shaikh, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-Hoc Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 489B and 489C of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Discharges Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere presence at the scene without knowledge or possession of counterfeit currency does not justify framing of charges under Sections 489B and 420 read with 34 of IPC.

The applicant, Asadjamal @ Irfan @ Dada s/o Mohammad Usman Siddiqui, was one of the accused in Sessions Case No.51 of 2012, pending before the Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Fake Currency Case Under NIA Act — Appellant Entitled to Bail on Grounds of Parity and Lack of Direct Evidence of Conspiracy

The appellant, Smt. J. Vanitha @ Thangam, was accused No.4 in Special Case No.785 of 2018 pending before the XLIX Additional City Civil and Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...