Search Results for "Section 47 CPC"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Execution Proceedings in Mortgage Suit — Decree Holder's Assignee Need Not Prove Legal Heirship Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC. The Court Held That the Executing Court Cannot Go Behind the Decree to Examine the Validity of Assignment.

The present Civil Revision Application arises from execution proceedings in a mortgage suit. The original decree holder, Kalubai, obtained a decree an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution Court Order in Land Dispute. Court holds that objections under Section 47 of CPC cannot be raised after 30 years of decree and that execution court cannot go behind the decree.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original decree holder Rukmini Pandurang Prabhu Alvekar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Boundary Correction in Execution Proceedings. Executing Court Cannot Modify Decree by Altering Property Description Beyond Decree's Terms Under Section 47 of CPC.

The Petitioner, The Ratnakar Bank Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12/04/2012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Executing Court's Order in Partition Execution — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Objections Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC Must Be Raised Before Sale Confirmation.

The case arises from a partition suit (Partition Suit No.945 of 1968) filed by the heirs of Bachhusingh, who died intestate on 24-11-1964, concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Execution Decree in Property Suit — Held that Execution Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Must Execute It as It Is. Objections Regarding Fraud and Transfer of Property Must Be Raised in Suit or Appeal, Not in Execution Proceedings Under Section 47 CPC.

The petitioner, Sukumar Estates Ltd. (now Kumar Housing Corporation Limited), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cha...