Search Results for "Section 408 CrPC"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Complainant Bank, Restores Criminal Proceedings Quashed by High Court. High Court Erred in Quashing Charge-Sheet Solely Because Other Alleged Co-Accused Were Not Arraigned; Section 319 CrPC Provides Remedy to Array Additional Accused During Trial.

The appellant, M/s Suvarna Cooperative Bank Ltd, filed a complaint under Section 200 CrPC before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer Petition in Criminal Case Due to Apprehension of Bias — Sessions Judge's Order Quashed for Non-Application of Mind. Section 408 CrPC Transfer Application Allowed as Magistrate's Conduct Raised Reasonable Apprehension of Bias.

The petitioners, who are the original applicants in Criminal Misc. Transfer Application No. 50 of 2019, filed a petition under Section 408 of the Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Complainant Company in Criminal Complaint — Magistrate's Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC Restored. Revisional Court Erred in Dismissing Complaint as Not Being a Complaint Under Section 2(d) CrPC When It Clearly Contained Allegations of Cognizable Offences.

The petitioner, M/s. Royal Palms (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a complaint through its authorized representat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Explanation — Section 468 CrPC Limitation Bars Prosecution for Offences Under Sections 498A, 494, 506 IPC Alleged After 24 Years.

The petitioner, Mahesh R., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance taken by the IV Additional Senior...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petitions in Criminal Cases Alleging Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Cause of Action Not Wholly Absent in Gurugram

The petitioner, Kaushik Chatterjee, was appointed as Group Chief Risk Officer-Executive Director of a non-banking finance company (the second responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Co-opted Director in Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner, a medical practitioner co-opted as director of a cooperative bank, was not named in charge-sheets and no material showed her involvement in alleged misappropriation.

The petitioner, a medical practitioner, was co-opted as a director of Samta Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative society running banking business, from 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...