Search Results for "Section 372 proviso"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Maintainability of Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Complainant's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC Does Not Require Leave Under Section 378 CrPC.

The applicant, Madhav Shriramji Khadse, was the original accused in Summary Criminal Complaint No. 1288/2008 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Section 175(4) BNSS in Sexual Assault Case Against Police Officers -- Clarifies Public Servant Immunity and Investigation Procedures Under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

The Supreme Court addressed a criminal appeal involving interpretation of Section 175(4) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) -- The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Without Leave Requirement Under Section 372 CrPC. The Court held that the victim's right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC is independent and does not require leave, distinguishing it from the State's appeal under Section 378 CrPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Naval Kishore Mishra, the brother of a deceased victim, against the High Court's dismissal of his appeal cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant's Appeal Under Section 372 Proviso Not Maintainable. Complainant Already Had Right to Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC, So Sessions Court Proceedings Were Nullity.

The applicant, Ganesh Bandu Badgujar, was the original accused in a complaint filed by respondent no.1, Mangalabai Ashokbhai Patel, alleging an offenc...