Search Results for "Section 372 CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Re...

Search Results for "Section 372 CrPC"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Murder Case Due to Absconding Accused and Proclaimed Offender Status -- High Court's Direction for Surrender and Regular Bail Deemed Illegal Under CrPC and IPC

13 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the original complainant against the High Court's order granting anticipatory bail to the accused in a murder c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Former Officers of Mysore Paper Mills in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Renders Proceedings Invalid. The court held that the order taking cognizance without prior sanction is invalid and the proceedings are liable to be quashed.

25 Nov 2021

The petitioners, former officers of Mysore Paper Mills (a State Government undertaking), challenged the order dated 06-05-2013 passed by the Principal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Victim's Counsel to Assist Prosecution in Sessions Trial — Right to Oral Arguments and Cross-Examination Under Section 301 CrPC. Victim's Counsel Can Participate Actively in Prosecution Subject to Public Prosecutor's Control and Court's Permission.

20 Sep 2019

The appeal arose from a Sessions trial where the appellant, Rekha Murarka, was the widow of the deceased and de facto complainant in a murder case. Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Deletion of Leave Requirement Under Section 378 CrPC Does Not Automatically Entitle Complainant to Admission of Appeal for Final Hearing. The Court Must Still Apply Its Mind to Merits Before Admitting Appeal.

8 Jul 2015

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by complainants against acquittal. The core legal issue was whether, after the amendment to Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant's Appeal Under Section 372 Proviso Not Maintainable. Complainant Already Had Right to Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC, So Sessions Court Proceedings Were Nullity.

9 Dec 2013

The applicant, Ganesh Bandu Badgujar, was the original accused in a complaint filed by respondent no.1, Mangalabai Ashokbhai Patel, alleging an offenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conversion of Conviction from Section 325 to Section 323 IPC — Procedural Amendment Not Retrospective to Affect Accused's Vested Right of Appeal. The court held that the proviso to Section 372 CrPC inserted in 2009 is prospective and does not apply to judgments delivered before its commencement, thus the revision could not be converted into an appeal.

25 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Nandabai, was the original complainant in a criminal case against the respondent-accused, Maruti Gopala Mehetre, for causing hurt. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Leave to Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Maintainability of Appeal by Complainant as Victim Under Section 372 CrPC. Forum for appeal against acquittal in a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is the Sessions Court, not the High Court, by virtue of the proviso to Section 372 read with Section 2(wa) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

16 Jun 2011

The applicant, M/s. Top Notch Infotronix (I) Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeki...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)