Search Results for "Section 364A IPC"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Ransom Demand Under Sections 363, 364A, 120B IPC — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Abducting Minor Son of Factory Owner and Demanding Rs. 1 Lakh Ransom.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammed Mosin Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 363, 364A r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Victim's Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Victim Cannot Appeal Under Section 372 CrPC for Inadequate Sentence; Only State Government Can Seek Enhancement Under Section 377 CrPC.

The appellant, Parvinder Kansal, was the father of a deceased boy and the complainant in FIR No.742 of 2007 registered for offences under Section 364A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Section 364A IPC. Court finds no demand for ransom or threat to kill, essential for Section 364A IPC, and grants bail under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Manjunatha @ Manju, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Kidnapping Case Falls Apart: Court Acquits Accused Due to Procedural Flaws and Insufficient Evidence. A detailed examination of a kidnapping case reveals significant investigation lapses, leading to the acquittal of the accused and raising concerns about the integrity of the prosecution.

A kidnapping case involving Sachin Garg and the subsequent legal proceedings. The key issues highlighted include procedural flaws, inconsistencies in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1)(b) CrPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 364A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and threat beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a minor boy, Sumit, son of Shantaram Kumbhar (PW1), on 18th November 2002. The prosecution alleged that the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder in Section 364A IPC Case — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Victim's Body. Appellants' Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Chain of Circumstances Leading to Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping for ransom and subsequent murder of a 10-year-old boy, the son of a police constable. The appellants, Shashikant T...