Search Results for "Section 304II"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Uncorroborated Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Sole Testimony of Son of Deceased Lacks Independent Corroboration and Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by the accused challenging their conviction under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay s/o Nagu Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar in Sessions Case No. 25/2011 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Brother's Death Due to Sudden Fight Over Motorcycle. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC for causing death of brother during sudden quarrel without premeditation.

The appellant, Sunil s/o Dharma Durge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 130 of 2012 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Brother's Death Due to Sudden Provocation. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC for causing death of brother during sudden quarrel over motorcycle use.

The appellant, Sunil Durge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part I of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 397 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The appellant, Anil Lilachand Sarjare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.132/2007 for offences under Sections 307 read ...