Search Results for "Section 279 IPC"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on rash and negligent driving causing death of four persons under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC affirmed.

The appellant, Thangasamy, was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Sections 279, 337 (3 counts), and 304-A (4 counts) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Criminal Case, Modifying Sentence to Fine After 26 Years. Conviction Under Sections 279 and 338 IPC Affirmed, but Imprisonment Substituted with Fine Based on Lapse of Time and Precedent, Citing Harshness of Incarceration After Long Delay.

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the appellant, a bus driver, was convicted for offences under Sections 279, 337, and 338 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Rash and Negligent Driving Case. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Maintained While Substantive Imprisonment Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Mitigating Circumstances Including Compensation Payment and Family Situation.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving Under IPC Sections 279 and 337 — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence Upheld

The applicant, Hamza Mohd. Ibrahim Ansari, was the original accused in C.C.No.769/P/1987 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 18th Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Rash Driving Case: Sentences to Run Concurrently. The Court held that under Section 31 CrPC, it is mandatory to specify whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively, and directed concurrent running of sentences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The appellant, Gagan Kumar, was prosecuted and convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Confirms Sentence for Causing Grievous Hurt. Court holds that evidence of injured witnesses and mechanical inspection report sufficiently established rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC.

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammed Ali Aga, was the driver of a mini bus (registration no. GA-02/T-4897) that met with an accident on 05/03/2010 near Vadd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 304(A) and 279 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Rash or Negligent Driving Causing Death.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Bashir Janubhai Pathan, who was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Pathardi, for o...