Search Results for "Section 217 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in Property Tax Assessment Dispute — Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Does Not Entitle Exemption from Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The appeal was filed by Akruti Nirman Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, Shri Vyomesh M. Shah, challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judge o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 235 Days in Filing Appeal Not Explained with Affidavit or Proper Grounds, Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed an application for condonation of delay of 235 days in filing a first appeal against a decision of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Nagari Niwara Parishad vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai: Property Tax Adjustment and Legal Complexities "Examining the interplay of rateable value, property tax adjustments, and legal obligations under the MMC Act."

This judgment addresses the appeals filed by Nagari Niwara Parishad, a public charitable trust, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...