Search Results for "Section 165A"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC for Abusive Words Uttered in Heat of Quarrel Against Public Figure — Held That Section 295A Requires Deliberate and Malicious Intent to Insult Religious Beliefs, Not Mere Offensive Remarks

The applicant, Khyyum s/o Khadir Patwari, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) Read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dattatraya Udaji Warkad, a Patwari, was convicted by the Special Court, Buldhana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Auditor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and voluntary acceptance of illegal gratification.

The appellant, Jagdish Dhanurdhar Kalbage, an Auditor by profession, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case 1/1999 for offences pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Baliram s/o Mansingh Chawhan, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No. 3/1998 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Tax Collector in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Demand of Illegal Gratification for Issuing Tax Demand Notice Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Dayaram s/o Balram Kuthe, was a Tax Collector with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The complainant, Dharamraj Natthuji Madankar, cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Gajanan s/o Lobhaji Dahale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...