Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

268 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 268 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

16 Apr 2026

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

High Court

High Court Partially Allows Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC in NI Act Case - Quashes Proceedings Against Company Under IBC Moratorium But Continues Against Directors. Court Held That Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Bars Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor, But Directors Remain Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Natural Persons.

10 Feb 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by petitioners who ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Penalty on Part-Time Director in FERA Contravention Case Due to Lack of Specific Findings on Responsibility. Liability Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Requires Proof That Director Was in Charge of and Responsible for Conduct of Business at Relevant Time, Not Mere Directorship.

27 Jul 2020

The appeal arose from a penalty imposed on the appellant, a part-time non-executive director of Modi Xerox Ltd., for alleged contravention of the Fore...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Averments. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 quashed as petitioners were not signatories to the cheque and complaint lacked specific allegations of their role in day-to-day affairs.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Shaju K. Nair and Riya Nair, were directors of M/s. Clariya Marketing Services Private Limited. The respondent, M/s. S.L.V. Steels & ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint Against Managing Director and Director in Dishonour of Cheque Case for Lack of Specific Averments. Failure to Allege Role in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company Renders Prosecution Unsustainable Under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Shaju K. Nair (Managing Director) and Riya Nair (Director) of M/s. Clariya Marketing Services Private Limited, filed a criminal petit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Revision Against SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Discharge in SEBI Prosecution for Non-Payment of Penalty. Vicarious Liability of Directors Under Section 27 SEBI Act Questioned Due to Absence of Specific Averments in Complaint.

15 Jan 2018

The matter arose from four Criminal Revision Applications filed before the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order of the SEBI Special Court t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Role in Company Affairs. Petitioner was not in charge of or responsible for conduct of business of the company at the time of offence, essential for vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

17 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Mrs. Lata Pramod Dave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 227 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case — Cheque Not Drawn on Accused's Account. Applicant cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was drawn on the account of a proprietorship firm, not on the personal account of the accused.

12 Feb 2016

The applicant, Dr. (Mrs) Rajul Ketan Raj, was accused no.1 in three complaints filed by Reliance Capital Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

5 Sep 2014

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Section 138 NI Act Case, Holding Unsigned Complaint is Curable Irregularity. Amendment to Sign Complaint Relates Back to Date of Filing, Saving Limitation.

18 Mar 2010

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by M/s. Reliance Indus...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)