Search Results for "Section 133 Karnataka Land Reforms Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 133 Karnataka Land Reforms Act"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

3 Mar 2025

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

6 Feb 2024

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between family members. The appellants in SA-284-2019 were the original defendant...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appellate Tribunal Order in Land Grant Dispute Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act — Tenant's Claim for Occupancy Rights Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. The Court held that the tenant failed to prove continuous cultivation as required under Section 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, and the Tribunal's order was perverse and unsustainable.

14 Aug 2013

The petitioners, who were the landlords, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30....

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)