Search Results for "Section 124A"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the accident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

The appellant, Dalit s/o Tukaram Mudkhede, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation for injuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Accidental Fall from Train. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Occurred in a Railway Accident.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, Nagorao s/o Gangaram Kamble and Sow. Vithabai w/o Nagorao Kamble, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Train Accident Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Amputation of Leg Due to Fall from Train Held as 'Accidental Falling' from Train Carrying Passengers.

The appellant, Ramesh Istari @ Istaru Kore, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, alleging that on 24.2.2016, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Railways Act. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Existence of Deceased as Passenger, Despite Evidence of Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellant, Ranjanabai Tukaram Jatale, mother of deceased Suresh Tukaram Jatale, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Sets Aside Tribunal's Finding of Rashness. Death of Passenger Falling from Train at Station Held to be 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 124A of the Indian Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, being the widow and sons of the deceased Vikram Darkonde, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Alighting from Offside Due to Rush Not a Criminal Act. Held that falling from train due to own negligence is not a criminal act under Section 124A proviso (c) of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Rekha Suryvanshi, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained while alighting...