Search Results for "Section 124-A Railways Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 124-A Railways Act"

145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

High Court

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

20 Jun 2024

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Untoward Incident Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and the incident of falling from a train is an untoward incident, reversing the Tribunal's dismissal.

19 Apr 2024

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Jayamma, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, dated 2...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Injured While Deboarding Wrong Train — Negligence Not a Bar Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that an accidental fall from a train while attempting to deboard a moving train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway is strictly liable for compensation regardless of the passenger's negligence.

11 Nov 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the decision of the Railway Claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Death Due to Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Parents of deceased son who died after being run over by train while crossing railway track held entitled to compensation as death was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on ground of negligence.

9 Nov 2022

The appellants, Ganesh Waman Waghmare and Kusum Ganesh Waghmare, are the parents of the deceased Shubham Ganesh Waghmare. They filed a claim for compe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Deceased Passenger's Family in Railway Accident Case — Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger While Alighting and Walking on Track Due to Lack of Foot Overbridge. The Court held that the deceased remained a bonafide passenger and the incident was an untoward incident under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling the claimants to compensation under Section 124-A.

10 Oct 2022

The appellants, being the widow, son, and mother of the deceased Manohar Gajbhiye, filed a claim under the Railways Act, 1989 before the Railway Claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Fall from Train as Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Recovery of Valid Monthly Season Ticket from Deceased's Body Establishes Bona Fide Passenger Status, Reversing Tribunal's Finding of Trespass.

9 Mar 2021

The appellants, parents of the deceased Milind Balaram Sakpal, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, alleging t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed 'Accidental Fall' Not Suicide Under Section 124A(a) of Railways Act, 1989. Court holds that mere statement of guard without corroboration is insufficient to prove suicide, and presumption of bonafide passenger stands.

11 Feb 2020

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which rejected the claim of the appellants (legal heirs of deceased Nanda Gi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a passenger due to accidental fall from train is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is liable to pay compensation regardless of negligence.

10 Jul 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, the widow and children of the deceased Ramlu Renalwar, challenging the judgment and award of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Passenger Falling from Moving Train While Boarding - Untoward Incident Under Railways Act. The court held that an accident caused from a moving train while trying to board or deboard it is covered by the definition of 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the appellant's amputation injury is covered by the amended schedule, entitling him to compensation.

3 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shashikant Dhage, filed a claim under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation for grievous injuries sustained in a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989 Established. Sudden Jerk While Alighting from Train Constitutes an Untoward Incident, and Railway's Denial of Ticket Validity Not Sustained.

18 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Recovery Cla...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)