Search Results for "Section 124 Customs Act"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Abroad; State Legislations of Orissa, Bihar, Kerala and Jharkhand Under Scrutiny

Background: The case involves a batch of civil appeals before the Supreme Court concerning the levy of entry tax on goods imported from foreign countr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Customs Duty Payable on Redemption of Confiscated Goods Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 — Interest Under Section 28AB Also Attracts. Redemption fine does not substitute duty; duty and interest are separate liabilities.

The Supreme Court adjudicated two questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962: whether customs duty is payable when confiscated goods are redeemed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...