Search Results for "Section 11(1) Preventive Detention Act"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Ganeshbhai S/o Appa Bhadane, was preventively detained by an order dated 30/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat, classify...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Preventive detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 cannot be based solely on registration of FIRs without evidence of disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Rameshchandra Ramlal Kakhujulaha (Kabirpanthi), filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India through his f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Preventive detention set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order under Section 3 of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Rudresh Chandubhai Patel, through his wife Raginiben Rudresh Patel, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chapter Proceedings Under Section 107 CrPC Based on Single FIR Without Independent Material. Mere Registration of Criminal Case Insufficient to Justify Preventive Action Under Section 107 CrPC.

The petitioners, Sandeep Shivaji Mhatre, Tushar Bhimsen Saigaokar, and Nilesh @ Sonu Mahanand Jadhav, filed three separate criminal writ petitions cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Smuggling of High Speed Diesel. Non-Supply of Bail Order Held Not Fatal to Detention Order as Detenu Was Aware of It.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Samad Ismail Deshmukh, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Non-Consideration of Bail Order and Retraction of Statements Violates Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Ganesh Maharudra Desai, challenged the detention order dated 6/8/2009 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation...