Search Results for "SAIL Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "SAIL Rules"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

26 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit — Vessel Arrest Set Aside for Lack of Same Beneficial Ownership. The court held that the arrest of a vessel under admiralty jurisdiction requires proof that the vessel is in the same beneficial ownership as the charterer liable for the claim, and mere common control or management is insufficient.

9 Dec 2019

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, the registered owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, against an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Appeals in Part in Arbitration Dispute Over Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Clarifies That an Award Creditor Can Seek Interim Relief During Section 34 Proceedings to Secure the Award Amount.

31 Jul 2019

The case involves cross appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a common order dated 1 July 2019 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by National Institute of Industrial Engineering Challenging Trade Union Registration. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for NITIE Under Section 2(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as NITIE is Not an Industry Carried on Under the Authority of the Central Government.

4 Feb 2019

The case involves a writ petition filed by the National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by National Institute of Industrial Engineering Challenging Trade Union Registration. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for NITIE Under Section 2(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Allowing Union Registration Under MRTU & PULP Act.

4 Feb 2019

The case involves a writ petition filed by the National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Mum...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Electricity Board in Pay Parity Case for Sub Fire Officers. Sub Fire Officers Held Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Other Posts in Group XII Due to Inclusion in Same Group Without Justifiable Differentiation.

8 Jan 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana which dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Punjab State Electric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition Alleging Scandalizing of Lower Court. Use of Words 'Extraneous Considerations' in Review Application Held Not to Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

20 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Col. Mahendra Pratap Choudhary, filed a criminal contempt petition under Section 15 read with Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MOIL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Non-Discriminatory and in Public Interest. Transfer orders of 24 employees of MOIL Limited were challenged as arbitrary and violative of transfer policy; court held that transfers were in public interest and no mala fides established.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 24 employees of MOIL Limited, a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the mana...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)