Search Results for "Right to make representation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Right to make representation"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act Case — Detenu's Right to Make Representation Not Effectively Communicated. Failure to Inform Detenu of His Right to Make Representation to the Advisory Board and the State Government Renders Detention Order Invalid Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur, under Section 3 of the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds. Failure to Supply Copies of Documents Relied Upon Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

8 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA — No Infirmity Found as Grounds Were Communicated in Language Understood by Detenu. Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) Not Violated.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, a detenu under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), filed a writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as State Failed to Explain Delay of Over 100 Days in Disposing Detenu's Representation, Violating Article 22(5) of Constitution.

18 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Devendra Ramlal Bidlan, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offender...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Recital of Grounds. Detenu's Preventive Detention Based on Three Criminal Cases Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Did Not Properly Assess 'Disturbed Area' Condition.

3 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Ajay Nandkishor Pasi, challenged his preventive detention order dated September 9, 2019, passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Representation. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Unexplained Delay of 22 Days in Disposal of Representation Violated Article 22(5) of Constitution.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Maimuna, wife of the detenu Sri. Akbar Siddik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

4 Jan 2018

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) in Habeas Corpus Petition. Detenu's Right to Make Representation in Language Understood by Him Upheld, Detention Order Set Aside.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Prevention of Black Marketing Act Due to Variance in Translation. Translation Supplied to Detenu Mentioned 'Public Order' Instead of 'Supplies of Essential Commodities', Violating Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

3 Aug 2010

The petitioner, brother of detenu Salim Maqbul Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 13.03.2010 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, un...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)