Search Results for "Retrenchment compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Retrenchment compensation"

254 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Retrenchment of School Employee Falls Under MRTU & PULP Act, Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction. The court held that termination without following Section 5 of MEPS Act constitutes retrenchment under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, exclusively triable by Industrial Court.

13 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Neena B. Rangnekar, was employed as a Junior Clerk with respondent no.1 Trust from 1 February 1989 and later promoted to Senior Clerk....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Retrenchment Case — Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Automatically Entitle Workman to Reinstatement; Compensation of Rs. 50,000 Awarded Instead. The court held that relief for illegal retrenchment is discretionary and depends on facts such as nature of employment and length of service.

29 Jun 2021

The appellant, Hemant Babruvahan Parchake, was appointed as a Senior Caretaker on a daily wage basis by the respondent Social Welfare Officer and Dist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition Challenging Government's Refusal to Refer Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appropriate Government Exceeded Its Power by Delving into Merits and Considering Irrelevant Factors Such as Acceptance of Retrenchment Compensation by Some Workmen.

27 Jan 2020

The petitioner, United Mine Workers Union, challenged the communication dated 3rd September 2019 issued by the Union of India (Ministry of Labour and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Hotel Employees Terminated Without Notice or Wages Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-conditions of Notice and Compensation.

5 Dec 2018

The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions filed by workmen and their employer, Eastern International Hotel, challenging an order dated 06/06/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction for Retrenchment Compensation Reimbursed by Assessee to Subsidiary Under Contractual Agreement. The court held that retrenchment compensation paid by the subsidiary and reimbursed by the assessee under a contractual agreement is allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was incurred for commercial expediency and business reorganization.

26 Aug 2016

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 1980-81. The assessee, The Wall...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contractual Workmen in BESCOM Case — Compensation Reduced to Rs.75,000 Each. Workmen Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Period Held Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service but Without Backwages Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves writ appeals filed against an order of a learned Single Judge who upheld the award of the Labour Court but directed payment of Rs.75...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Daily Wage Workers Seeking Reinstatement Under Kalelkar Award. Workers Held Not Covered by Award but Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation Under Chapter VA of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

22 Mar 2013

The case involves an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15.10.19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Order for Retrenchment Compensation Under Section 33(c)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Liable Despite Nationalization and Transfer of Undertaking.

16 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Empress Mills (a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation), challenged an order dated 14.12.1998 passed by the First Labour Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

18 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Workman Retrenched Due to Computerization. Introduction of computers does not constitute a valid ground for retrenchment without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14 Mar 2005

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging a common award of the Labour Court dated 19th September 2002. The workman, Mohammed Asad Khan,...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)