Search Results for "Retirement age"

834 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 834 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Pension Dispute, Holding Resignation Forfeits Past Service. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Rules Came Into Force Not Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Despite Completing 22 Years of Service.

The case involves an appeal by BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. against a Delhi High Court judgment granting pensionary benefits to the first respondent, Ghansh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Gratuity in Pending Criminal Appeals Under Kerala Service Rules. Interpretation of Rules 3 and 3A of Kerala Service Rules Distinguishes Pension from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity, Prohibiting Withholding Despite Conviction with Suspended Sentence.

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from a Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the entitlement of government employees to D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.

The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...