Search Results for "Reshma Kumari"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Multiplier Application. Compensation Enhanced as Multiplier Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Split Methodology, Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The legal heirs of deceased V. Rajasekaran appealed against a compensation order by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 7.11.2017, which gran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Bachelor Deceased. Multiplier Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Dependents, to Ensure Uniform Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Supreme Court addressed the legal issue of whether, in motor accident claims involving the death of a bachelor, the multiplier for calculating com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation for Death of Apprentice Steward. Future Prospects and Correct Multiplier Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Vincentina Paulina D'Souza, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Goa seeking compensation for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence and Wrong Multiplier Application. The court held that the claimant failed to prove rashness and negligence, and the multiplier should be based on the father's age, not the deceased's.

The case involves an appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd against a judgment and award dated 07.07.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Tractor Accident Victim Awarded Rs.1,50,000 with 6% Interest for Fracture Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma, husband and wife, who sustained injuries in a tractor accident on 19.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Held that the Tribunal's assessment of compensation was just and proper, and the insurer is liable to pay the awarded amount.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma (claimants) seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a trac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Multiplier applied as per Second Schedule to MV Act for structured compensation calculation.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award dated 25.6.2007 in MVC No. 879/2006 by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) & MACT, Gangavathi. The cl...