Search Results for "Rent control exemption"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Confirms Findings on Default, Subletting, and Bonafide Requirement. Tenants Failed to Comply with Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and Unlawfully Sublet Premises.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendants (tenants) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Jurisdiction Case — Decree Passed After Act's Applicability Is Void. Civil Court Loses Jurisdiction Once Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 Applies to Area; Decree Passed Thereafter Is Void Ab Initio.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the tenant-appellants against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had dismissed their revisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Ejectment Suit for Lack of Title Proof and Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Trustees failed to establish devolution of leasehold interest and maintainability of suit under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The applicants, claiming to be trustees under a Deed of Wakf dated 22 December 1942, filed a suit for ejectment against the respondents in the Court o...