Search Results for "Regency Hotels"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Regency Hotels"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.

29 Nov 2024

The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Directs Strict Compliance of Fire Safety Norms for High Rise Buildings in Panaji — Public Interest Litigation on Fire Safety Measures. The Court expanded the scope of the petition to cover all high rise buildings and issued directions for inspection and compliance with fire safety regulations.

15 Dec 2022

The judgment pertains to a public interest litigation filed in 2004 by Gurudas G. Pai, raising concerns about fire safety compliance in high rise buil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Defendants in Injunction Suit. Principle of dominus litus does not bar court from adding necessary parties under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

11 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Ashok Babarao Patil, filed a Regular Civil Suit No. 209 of 2021 for a simplicitor injunction to restrain the defendants from interferi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Copyright Dispute Over Film 'Sheela' — Prima Facie Finding of Valid Assignment Chain. Court holds that registered assignments under Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957 prevail over unregistered subsequent assignments.

21 Apr 2021

The dispute concerns the copyright in the 1987 Hindi motion picture 'Sheela', originally produced by BS Dwarakish. Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Permission to File Written Statement Beyond Limitation in Specific Performance Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory; Legal Representatives of Deceased Defendant Allowed to File Written Statement as No Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.

18 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Subhash Dhanraj Sankla, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property owned by Rhoda Phiroze Noble. The ori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy. The court ruled that revenue authorities cannot decide title disputes and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for such matters.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Mr. Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal and M/s. Rajeshwar Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property — Purchaser Failed to Demonstrate Willingness to Complete Transaction. Readiness without willingness is insufficient for specific performance under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff insisted on adjustment of loans without calling upon defendant to pay its share.

8 Apr 2019

The suit was filed by G Ram Construction Company (plaintiff) against Chowgule & Company (Hind) Pvt Ltd (defendant) for specific performance of an agre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

12 Mar 2014

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)