Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"

1548 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1548 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq.ft Based on Comparable Sale Instances.

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The land, measuring 1.21 HR (1,29,345 sq.ft) out of Survey No. 118/3 at Digras, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.

Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications Due to Delay Condonation and Enhanced Compensation Claims. The court held that delay in filing reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 should be condoned and matters remitted for fresh adjudication.

The judgment involves multiple civil revision applications filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for public purposes under the Land Acquisitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.

The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...