Search Results for "Recruitment Rules 2011"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Recruitment Rules 2011"

497 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 497 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Reserved Category Candidates in Teacher Recruitment Case Challenging Exclusion from Merit List. Court Holds That Relaxation in Teachers Eligibility Test Qualifying Marks Does Not Bar Migration to Open Category Based on Merit in Main Selection Examination Under Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

23 Mar 2026

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dated 14.02.2025, which dismissed writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores 25% LDCE Quota for District Judges and Reforms Judicial Recruitment in All India Judges Association Case. The Court addresses eight issues including LDCE quota restoration, minimum experience reduction, merit quota, suitability test, and practice requirement for Civil Judge (Junior Division) examination.

17 Jul 2025

This judgment by the Supreme Court of India addresses multiple applications in the ongoing All India Judges Association case concerning the qualificat...

High Court

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

2 Aug 2024

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

Supreme Court

Challenging Minimum Qualifying Marks in Judicial Appointments: Upholding Constitutional Integrity Exploring the Constitutionality of Viva Voce Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat District Judiciary Selection Processes

6 May 2024

The constitutionality of rules prescribing minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test for appointments to the District Judiciary in Bihar and Guja...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

10 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Degree Holders in Junior Engineer Recruitment Dispute - Upholds High Court's View that Degree is Not Higher Qualification than Diploma Under Recruitment Rules. The Court held that a degree in Electrical Engineering cannot be considered a higher qualification than a diploma for the post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) as per the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, where the essential qualification is specifically a diploma.

7 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the eligibility of degree holders for appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) in the Hi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Departmental Promotees — Rules That Date of Selection, Not Appointment, Determines Seniority Under Rule 27 of Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Services Rules, 1975. The Court found that the department deliberately accelerated the DP recruitment process to give them an unfair advantage, which was mala fide and impermissible.

24 Jan 2020

The case involved a dispute over seniority between direct recruits (DRs) and departmental promotees (DPs) for the post of Tax Assistants in the Rajast...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in OAS Recruitment Case — No Right Accrues from Mere Recommendation. Mere recommendation for promotion does not confer a vested right; abolition of cadre and repeal of rules extinguishes any claim.

3 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had directed the State to conve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

6 Aug 2018

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)