Search Results for "Reconnaissance permit"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process.

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Disposes of Criminal Petitions Seeking Quashing of Proceedings Under Mines and Minerals Act. The Petitions Challenged Registration of Cases Under IPC and MMRD Act, 1957, Claiming Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Section 22.

The High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench, presided by Justice H.P. Sandesh, heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...