Search Results for "Range Forest Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Range Forest Officer"

207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Dwellers in Forest Rights Act Case — Upholds Rejection of Claims Due to Lack of Evidence of Continuous Occupation Prior to 2005. The court held that the burden of proof lies on claimants under Section 3(1) of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, and that the writ petition was not maintainable as an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 8 was available.

10 Mar 2026

The appellants, 21 individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 10.03.202...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Sandalwood Confiscation Case — High Court Order Restored. Confiscation under Section 61A(2) of Kerala Forest Act, 1961 invalid as no forest offence proved; landowners entitled to benefit of Government Order dated 03.04.1973 for auction of sandalwood on private patta lands.

14 May 2024

The case involves appeals by the State of Kerala and its Divisional Forest Officer against a High Court judgment that set aside the confiscation of sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forest Department Transit Fee on Imported Timber. Imported timber from foreign country is not 'forest produce' under Maharashtra Forest Rules, 1970, and no transit fee can be levied for its transportation from port to customs CFS.

16 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Omprakash Nagoja, a sole proprietor of O.P.M. International, imported timber from a foreign country. The timber arrived at Jawaharlal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Vesting of Private Forest Land Under Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The court affirmed the tribunal's rejection of the claimant's exemption plea due to insufficient evidence of principal cultivation as plantation under Section 2(f) of the Act.

29 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over the vesting of land under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The respondent, Popular ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

6 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Private Forest Vesting Case — Land Classified as Private Forest Under Section 2(c-i)(f) of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 Vests in State; No Evidence of Cultivation Produced.

8 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Gaurakshan Sanstha, a public trust established in 1962 for Panjarpole purposes, owned agricultural land in various villages. In 1985, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Confiscation of Vehicles and Timber Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Lack of Mens Rea and Bona Fide Possession Established. The court held that confiscation under Section 61-A requires proof of intentional violation of the Act, and where the owner had a valid transit pass and permission, the confiscation order was unsustainable.

4 May 2019

The petitioners, Syed Burhan Syed Nabi, Sk. Kadir Sk. Vazir, and Mahendra Anil Madipal, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Forest Rights Claim Under Forest Rights Act, 2006 — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Non-Application of Mind. The impugned order was cryptic and did not record any reasons for rejection, violating the requirement of a speaking order under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

10 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Lalba Nana Bethekar, claiming to be a member of the Korku Scheduled Tribe, filed an application under Section 3 of the Scheduled Tribe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Forest Rights Claim Under Forest Rights Act, 2006. Cryptic Order Without Reasons Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration of Application by Korku Tribe Member.

10 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Lalba Nana Bethekar, claiming to be a member of the Korku Scheduled Tribe, filed an application under Section 3 of the Scheduled Tribe...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)