Search Results for "Railway Catering"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Deliberates on Employment Status of Contract Workers in Statutory Canteens Under Factories Act. The Court Examines Whether Workers Engaged by Contractor to Run Canteen Required Under Section 46 Are Deemed Employees of Principal Employer.

The appeals arose from a dispute over the employment status of casual workers employed by a contractor to run a canteen at Air India's premises. The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Pension Case, Upholding Tribunal's Inclusion of Past Commission Bearer Service. Consistent with Supreme Court's Munshi Ram, All Railway Employees Must Receive Equal Pension Benefits Without Zone-Based Discrimination.

The case concerned a service dispute over the pensionary benefits of a railway employee who had previously worked as a Commission Bearer. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Theft of Parcels — Natural Justice Violation Claim Rejected. Disciplinary proceedings valid despite non-supply of inquiry report as employee failed to show prejudice.

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from disciplinary proceedings against V.M. Shukla, a Parcel Clerk employed by Central Railway, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order in Railway Casual Labour Reinstatement Case. Central Administrative Tribunal's order for reinstatement of casual labour with continuity of service upheld as Railways failed to prove abandonment of service.

The petitioners, Union of India through the Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railways, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Workman in Railway Termination Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. Continuous Service Requirement Under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Satisfied Despite Intermittent Breaks.

The appellant, Shri Jairaj N. Shetty, was employed as a Casual Cook in the Catering Section of the Commercial Department, Central Railway, Mumbai V.T....