Search Results for "Rafiq Masih"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Teacher Challenging Recovery of Gratuity and Salary. Recovery of Excess Payment from Class III Employee After Retirement Held Impermissible Under Principles of State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Laxman Sitaram Idde, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a Zilla Parishad Primary School on 20 January 1986. He was a District Aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute — No Misrepresentation by Employee. Recovery of Rs.3,46,931/- from pension set aside as order passed without notice and employee not responsible for pay fixation error.

The petitioner, Rangrao s/o Mersing Jadhav, was appointed as a Peon on 08.11.1983 and superannuated on 31.08.2017 as Junior Administrative Officer (Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teacher Against Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Mistakenly During Service. Recovery of Mistaken Payment After Retirement Held Illegal Following Supreme Court Precedent in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Lata Gajanan Wankhede, a retired Assistant Teacher employed with Zilla Parishad, Akola, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Employees of Private Unaided Educational Institutes Seeking Regularisation. Institutes Not 'Schools' Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977, Hence No Entitlement to Absorption.

The petitioners, numbering 41 individuals, were employees of two private unaided educational institutes: Adv. V. R. Manohar Institute of Diploma in Ph...