Search Results for "RPAD notice"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application Filed by Original Plaintiff Against Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence. Litigant Must Inform Court or Advocate of Change of Address and Cannot Blame Advocate for Non-Appearance.

This civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arose from an order of the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Case Due to Non-Service of Summons. Ex Parte Decree Set Aside as Trial Court Erred in Treating Application Under Order 37 Rule 4 CPC as Review.

The appellant, M/s. Shakti Bioscience Ltd., filed an appeal against an ex parte judgment and decree dated 04.11.2015 passed by the City Civil Court, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC Requires Strict Compliance with Conditions for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Purnendu Shekharmal Jain, was the original defendant in Summary Suit No. 2539 of 2012 filed by M/s ACG Associated Capsules P Ltd. An ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Owners' Appeals and Quashes Land Acquisition Notification Due to Non-Implementation of Scheme Over 32 Years. Non-utilization of 88% of Acquired Land and 23-Year Delay in Compensation Deposit Render Acquisition Proceedings Void Under BDA Act.

The land owners owned property in Sy.No.4 of Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a preliminar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Cause of Action Arises from Second Notice When First Notice Not Served. Complaint Filed Within Limitation Based on Second Notice Dated 16th April 2003 and 21st April 2003.

The appellant, Praveen Otarmal Parmar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents, M/s. Abhir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Recovery of Money — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...