Search Results for "RFCTLARR Act"

71 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioners Against Union of India and NHAI -- Challenge to Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 Fails -- Section 94 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable

The petitioners, owners of galas in Godown L1, challenged NHAI's acquisition of part of the godown for the Vadodara Mumbai Expressway under the Nation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Directs Recalculation of Compensation Using 1/1/2014 as Reference Date Under Section 24(1)(a) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013, Where Award Was Made After Commencement of New Act.

The petitioners were owners of agricultural land in Choundi village, Latur district, Maharashtra, which was acquired by the State. A notification unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Due to Availability of Statutory Remedy Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Writ petitions held not maintainable as alternative remedy by reference to Land Acquisition Authority is efficacious.

The petitioners, Sow. Neha Jitendra Agrawal and Shri Rajendra Madhukar Kulkarni, filed separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Acquisition Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Land Acquired Under 1894 Act but Not Compensated Due to Unfulfilled Alternate Land Offer Entitles Petitioners to Compensation Under 2013 Act.

The petitioners, Shital Anna Walawade, Neminath Anna Walawade, and Suman Anna Walawade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Circular Restricting Land Compensation Under Consent Award. Circular dated 27.02.2020 Held Ultra Vires the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and Maharashtra Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahadeo Japkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Circular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...