Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

360 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 360 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

6 Jul 2026

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

High Court

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

7 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'MAUJ' vs 'MOJ' — No Deceptive Similarity Found. Phonetic and structural comparison of marks 'MAUJ' and 'MOJ' held not deceptively similar; plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for interim relief.

5 Jun 2023

The plaintiff, Mauj Mobile Private Limited, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'MAUJ' (registered in Classes...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Independent Reasoning Renders Appellate Judgment Unsustainable.

25 Nov 2022

The appellant (defendant) challenged the judgment of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.) Hubballi in RA No.126/2004 dated 12.12.2006, which rever...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Architect and Engineer in Building Collapse Case - No Prima Facie Case of Culpable Homicide Made Out. The court held that the allegations did not disclose the ingredients of Section 304 IPC as there was no intention or knowledge of likely death, and the case was more appropriately covered under Section 304-A IPC which is bailable.

7 Jan 2021

The judgment pertains to two anticipatory bail applications filed by Vivek Keshavrao Dongre, a civil engineer and proprietor of M/s Vertical Architect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Telgi Stamp Paper Scam. Multiple Accused Including Kingpin Abdul Karim Telgi Challenge Conviction Under IPC Sections 255-260, 120B.

4 Sep 2017

The judgment text provided is incomplete and does not contain the final decision. This batch of criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 660/2009, 510/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act includes substances for chewing, and that the ban on food products containing tobacco or nicotine is valid and not ultra vires.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, manufacturers and sellers of gutka and pan masala containing tobacco or nicotine, challenged the validity of the ban imposed by the C...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)