Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

345 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Revisional Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perverse. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding legally enforceable debt.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by the complainant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the accused-petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal Based on Perverse Findings. Statutory Presumption Under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused Despite Admission of Cheque Issuance.

The appellant, Uttam Ram, owned an apple orchard and supplied packing materials to apple growers, including respondent Devinder Singh Hudan. In Septem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Complainant's Failure to Prove Debt. High Court's Reversal Set Aside as Trial Court's Findings on Rebuttal of Presumption Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had reversed his acquitta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Acquittal Based on Fiduciary Relationship. Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Upset in Revision Without Perversity; Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Applies Even Between Fiduciaries.

The appellant-complainant, Bir Singh, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent-accu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal Based on Misappreciation of Statutory Presumption Under Section 139. The Court Held That the Accused Failed to Rebut the Presumption That the Cheque Was Issued for Discharge of a Debt or Liability.

The appellant, Ghanshyamdas Lalchand Chandak, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 241/1999 under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Proper Points of Determination and Ignoring Legal Presumption in Favour of Complainant.

The appellant, original complainant Sunil Thukral, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19/01/2011 of the Judicial Magistrate ...