Search Results for "Pre-deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Pre-deposit"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Pre-deposit Not Required at Condonation of Delay Stage. The court ruled that Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 does not mandate pre-deposit before considering an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 20 of the Act.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Council's Petition Challenging Ex Parte Stay in Rent Revision Appeals — Pre-deposit Under Section 170 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Mandatory Before Entertaining Appeals Against Rent Demands.

6 Nov 2006

The Municipal Council, Achalpur filed a writ petition seeking to treat it as a representative petition for 74 appeals filed against it by occupiers/al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Without Pre-deposit in Classification Dispute — Tribunal's Discretion Must Be Exercised Consistently. Pre-deposit direction set aside as Tribunal failed to follow its own earlier order on identical issue under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962.

25 Nov 2010

The appellant, Videocon Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of LCD TVs, had been regularly importing Liquid Crystal Device – Thin Film Transistor Module...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Section 21 Not Applicable at Condonation Stage. The court ruled that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 applies only at the stage of entertainment of appeal, not at the stage of considering an application for condonation of delay.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking Mandatory Deposit of VRS Benefits by Workmen Under MRTU & PULP Act. No Condition Precedent for Deposit Exists Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act for Challenging Voluntary Retirement Scheme.

8 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Saint Gobain Sekurit India Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the maintainability of complaints filed by respondent workmen un...

High Court

High Court Validates DRAT Order for Pre-Deposit Calculation in Secured Asset Auction Dispute. Pre-deposit determination upheld as per SARFAESI Act, focusing on "debt due" over auction value.

19 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court upheld the DRAT's order mandating a pre-deposit based on "debt due" when the measures under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Refusal to Stay Redemption Fine. Holds that Customs Tribunal Has Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Redemption Fine Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962, as Section 129E Does Not Apply.

8 Dec 2017

The appellant, Mydream Properties Private Limited, imported a yacht and VSAT equipment, against which the Commissioner of Customs passed an order-in-o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Full Predeposit of Penalty in FEMA Case — No Undue Hardship or Prima Facie Case Established. Appellant failed to demonstrate financial hardship or strong case on merits for waiver of predeposit under Section 19(1) of FEMA, 1999.

26 Apr 2012

The Appellant, Rajkumar Shivhare, was proceeded against for violation of Section 3(c) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) for allegedl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 75% Deposit Under Section 21 of RDB Act in Debt Recovery Appeal — No Waiver Granted as Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case or Financial Hardship.

22 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Sterlite Technologies Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Debts Recover...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)