Search Results for "Popular Construction"

187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Canned Pineapple Slices and Fruit Cocktail Preserved in Sugar Syrup Are Not Fresh Fruits Under Entry A-23 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Goods subjected to processing and preservation lose their character as fresh fruits and are taxable under the residuary entry.

The case concerns a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Nescafe Premix as Coffee Under Entry 3 of Schedule C Part II of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Product 'Coffee and Instant Drinks Nescafe Premix' Held Not Covered by Entry 18(2) (Beverages) Based on Common Parlance Test and Predominant Ingredient.

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeals in Gold Smuggling Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Violations. Confiscation of Gold and Imposition of Penalties Set Aside for Failure to Prove Smuggling Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves five appeals filed by Ciabro Alemao (through legal representatives), Joaquim Alemao, Churchill Alemao, Anthony John Rodrigues, and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Central Excise Appeal Limitation Case — Commissioner (Appeals) Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 60 Days Under Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal filed beyond 90 days from order date cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, M/s Sheetal Enterprises, a manufacturer of industrial lubricants, availed benefit of Nil rate of duty for export under Rules 13 and 14...