Search Results for "Plaint Return"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Plaint Return"

843 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Defendants’ Interim Applications for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Section 12-A Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Bar Under SARFAESI Act. Applications Filed by Financial Institution Defendants Against Real Estate Borrower Group.

4 Apr 2026

The dispute arises from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiffs against three defendants, seeking specific performance of a Framework Agreement date...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Government Suit for Declaration of Nullity of Decree — Trial Court's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that a suit challenging a decree as null and void on grounds of fraud or inherent lack of jurisdiction is maintainable and not barred by res judicata.

23 Jan 2026

The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the District Collector and other revenue officials, filed a civil suit (unnumbered O.S.SR.No.448 of 2022)...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Trial Court's Order to Decide Amendment Application Before Return of Plaint. Procedural Order Set Aside as Contrary to Order 7 Rule 10 CPC — Inherent Lack of Jurisdiction Cannot Be Cured by Amendment.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Akshay Quenim, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the Civil ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case: Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Applies to Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance When Relief of Permanent Injunction Was Sought in Previous Suit. The Court held that the plaintiff's entitlement to seek specific performance existed at the time of the first suit, and failure to include it bars the second suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 24.01.2007 between M/s Chemplast Cuddalore Vinyls Limited (respondent no.1/original plaintiff) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Returning Plaint Without Reasons in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance. District Court's Order Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Non-Compliance with Commercial Court Act.

12 Dec 2023

The appellant, Shreem Electric Limited, filed a Commercial Suit No. 4 of 2017 before the District Court, Kolhapur, seeking specific performance of pur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4 Sep 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Rejection of Plaint Return in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that valuation of suit for purposes of jurisdiction is determined by the market value of the property, not the consideration amount, and that the trial court's finding on valuation is a finding of fact not liable to interference in revision.

23 Jan 2023

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications challenging a common order dated 22.04.2022 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.

18 Jul 2022

The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

16 Jun 2014

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal by Charitable Society Regarding Leave to Institute Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Dispute Involves Whether a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Can Be Treated as a Trust and Sought Determination of the Conditions for Granting Leave Following Allegations of Financial Mismanagement and Breach of Trust.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by two plaintiffs, Dr. Shelly Batra and Mrs. Usha Gupta...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)