Search Results for "Personal search"

545 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Act Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Non-Production of Contraband. Benefit of Doubt Granted as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant was convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession of 6 kg 300 g of op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of 4.5 kg Ganja — Ten Years' Rigorous Imposition Confirmed. Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Conscious Possession and Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Ishwar Buddha, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, South Goa, for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 — Search of Bag Not Covered Under Mandatory Procedure. The court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, not to search of a bag, and thus the conviction was set aside.

The appellants, Rehanabi Sheikh Atiq and Sheikh Sohel Sheikh Atiq, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Special (NDPS) Case 2/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction for Possession of 85.810 kg Ganja Set Aside as Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures Were Not Followed.

The appellants, Mobin Khan and Taslim Khan, were convicted by the learned District Judge-6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special (N.D.P.S.)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Failure to Follow Mandatory Search Procedure Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Smt. Satyabhama Kishan Kardak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge for Greater Mumbai on 25 February 1993 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Conviction under Section 21 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before gazetted officer or magistrate.

The appellant, Suleman Oguk @ Soni, was convicted under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Forwarded to Superior Officer, Vitally Affecting the Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Satnamsingh Sodi, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (NDPS) No. 24/1998 for the offen...