Search Results for "Pay Refixation"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Review Application in Higher Grade Pay-Scale Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review of judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No. 523 of 2014 dismissed as applicants failed to show any error apparent on the face of the record under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The present application was filed by the applicants, who were original respondents in Letters Patent Appeal No. 523 of 2014, seeking review of the CAV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Directly Recruited Assistant Professors Seeking Stepping Up of Pay Based on Juniors' Pay. Rule 21 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 Not Applicable Where Anomaly Arises from Counting of Ad Hoc Services of Junior Colleagues.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by directly recruited Assistant Professors (the appellants) against the judgment of the Division ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion Challenge in Port Trust Service Matter — Adverse Remarks Must Be Communicated Before Being Considered for Promotion. Uncommunicated adverse remarks cannot be used to deny promotion to Assistant Traffic Manager under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Manuel Lourenco D'Costa, was an employee of the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao (respondent No.1). He was appointed as a Cle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner entitled to pay re-fixation from promotion date and junior's promotion dates with 6% interest on delayed arrears.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, entitled to re-fixation of basic pay from promotion date and interest on delayed payment under Article 226.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...